

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The Semantics of Derived Lexemes
المؤلف:
Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman
المصدر:
What is Morphology
الجزء والصفحة:
P139-C5
2026-04-10
69
The Semantics of Derived Lexemes
When somebody makes up a word, they are inventing it for use under a particular circumstance. Sometimes the circumstance can be very peculiar. Take the sentence in (6):
(6) Joe was Houdini’d and died.
In order to understand this sentence, you have to know something about Houdini – a famous escape artist – and how he died. He died following a series of punches to his stomach (a fan was testing the strength of his abdominal muscles, which Houdini prided himself on). So when we say “Joe was Houdini’d and died,” we mean he was punched in the stomach and died in the way that Houdini did. This is a dramatic example of how you might need to know pragmatic factors in order to understand a particular lexeme. We say more about examples like (6) below.
The second factor that can affect a word’s meaning is its history. We might think of every lexeme not just as a word and its meaning, but as the word and every time it has ever been used: every time we hear the word, we revise its lexical entry in some way. That this indeed goes on is particularly evident from first-language acquisition research. Children in earlier stages of language acquisition may underextend a word by using it to refer to only a subset of its actual referents, or overextend a word by using it to refer to objects or individuals that are typically covered by the word, as well as to others that are “perceptually similar” (Clark 1993: 33). For example, a child might underextend the word dog by using it to refer to more typical examples of the species, but not to varieties like Chihuahua or Pekingese (Kay and Anglin 1982), or overextend tree by using it to refer to potted plants, trees, and even balsam fir wreaths. Such under- and overextensions are generally short-lived, which indicates that children revise lexical entries as they are exposed to more and more tokens of a word.

It is not unreasonable to think that the meaning of a word is a compilation of every single use of that word that you have ever heard or said. Every word has a history. It has your own personal history – how you have heard the word. It has the history of the word as it has been used by other people. Over time, the meanings of words can become more complex and diverse, making the task of the morphologist looking for semantic patterns of word formation more complicated than it would be if the semantics of word formation were purely compositional (as the semantics of syntactic constructions are often considered to be). A syntactic construction may have pragmatics to deal with, but it doesn’t have history.
One question you might want to ask is what kinds of meanings arise via lexeme-formation rules. Are derived forms like lexemes, with potentially very complicated meanings? Or are they like syntactic collocations, with simple meanings?
الاكثر قراءة في Morphology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)