Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
Rubric design and implementation of the review process
المؤلف:
Sue A. Fellwock-Schaar & Pamela C. Krochalk & Mary J. Cruise
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P292-C25
2025-07-23
50
Rubric design and implementation of the review process
It is important to note that the GE Program Review is faculty driven and, as such, is a process in which faculty review faculty. Thus, it must be collegial in nature, sensitive, and unbiased while keeping student learning outcomes as the focus. As the process developed, it became clear that the demands of the review needed to be balanced with faculty workload that for many years had not included the collection of student and faculty data. In light of these issues, and prior to any data collection, GE Committee members developed guidelines and materials designed to capture the information needed in a sensitive and timely manner. These materials were first distributed to Area A Course Coordinators in Fall 2003-04. When the Area A Review Team began to read the course materials in the Spring, it became evident that an assessment rubric was needed. A rubric was then developed based on the guidelines and materials that had been distributed to the Course Coordinators in the Fall.
A question arose as to which kind of assessment rubric would be more beneficial to the review process-one with holistic ratings for each of the review sections, one with numerical ratings assigned for each component of each section, or a narrative worksheet with comments on each component? Two versions of the rubric were presented to the Review Team, one of which was holistic and the other that combined rating and narrative formats. Upon deliberation, use, and consensus, a model emerged which combines specific and holistic ratings with narrative (see Tables 1 and 2 in Discussion Review process). Based on an agreed upon 80% as the lower limit for acceptability of each item on the rubric, the descriptors in the holistic format vary in quality and quantity for each component across the ratings (see Table 1 in Discussion Review process). In Table 2 in Discussion Review process, the Lickert rating scale gives Review Team members the chance to rate each component of each section, and the narrative portion enables reviewers to elucidate specific concerns or highlight ways in which the teaching faculty are particularly responsive to course-level student learning objectives/outcomes and/or mastery of the University GE objectives.
Although not perfect, reviewers have generally agreed that the combination of formats provides a "reasonable guide" for the review process. While the rubrics are subject to modification by each review team, they have been used as is for Areas A, B, and C, and it is expected that modifications for future areas will be minor. The development of the rubric was critical in the process of conducting the Area reviews and it has encouraged both faculty and the reviewers to consistently focus on the essential components of the GE Program.
الاكثر قراءة في Teaching Strategies
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
