Assessment of speech and language difficulties

Obviously speech and language are complex processes and assessment often will be a collaborative activity between a range of professionals, e.g. speech and language therapist, educational psychologist, teacher, and of course parent/caretaker and the pupil. Contexts make a difference to communication and language performance and a reasonable aim of assessment is to establish consistencies and inconsistencies in the individual’s communication profile across a range of contexts. If, for example, the pupil can function better in an ICT lesson than, say, in the playground, this provides useful information about how the context influences the pupil’s ability to understand and communicate. Using this information the educator can modify the environment in order to maximize performance, i.e. by the use of visual support (possibly in some cases via the use of sign language); teaching and practicing the conventions of social communication in a one-to-one or small group setting, etc.; use of a peer support ‘buddy’ in the playground; explaining the rules of games that are played in the playground; use of TA support as a facilitator of playground interaction, etc. Observation in a range of contexts is thus an important assessment strategy for pupils with SLCN. Parents/caretakers are also crucial in informing schools as how to best to communicate with their child and can supply information about activities, siblings, other relatives, interests, likes/dislikes, etc. that will enable staff to establish and sustain conversations.

Different professionals have developed different approaches to assessment and it is important that there is some shared understanding between professionals if coherent planning is to be achieved.

Speech and language therapists have traditionally used the linguistic model described in Figure 1 (Bloom and Lahey, 1978). Assessments based on this model seek to describe language in term of these functions and identify where to focus therapy and or the ‘extra or different provision’ that might be needed in educational contexts via Individual Education Plans (IEPs) (DfES, 2001a). For many children with SLCN their difficulties seldom fall into ‘neat’ categories of content, form and use due to the interdependence of these areas of language and communication.

مواضيع ذات صلة

Discussion and questions

Expectations and suggestions

Problems encountered with portfolio assessment

Advantages of portfolio assessment

Similarities and differences between portfolio assessment and prior assessment experiences

Reflective questions with regard to the course practical relevance

Trainer comments

Discussion of a problem-solving experience

"Critical" course synthesis

Portfolio content

Results, analysis and discussions

Context and goals